AustraliaNews

Senior Coalition Leaders Reject Jacinta Price’s Abortion Comments

In a surprising turn of events, senior female members of the Coalition and staunchly pro-life senator Matt Canavan have publicly rejected comments made by Shadow Indigenous Australians Minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price regarding abortion. The swift rebuke comes amidst concerns that Price’s unauthorized statements could prove divisive and damaging to the opposition’s campaign strategy leading up to the crucial federal election.

Coalition Leaders Reject Price’s Abortion Stance

Prominent Coalition figures, including deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley, shadow finance spokesperson Jane Hume, and Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie, wasted no time in distancing themselves from Price’s controversial remarks. In a series of public statements, they emphasized that a Dutton-led Coalition government has “no plans, no policy and no interest in unwinding women’s reproductive rights.”

Hume went so far as to characterize the abortion debate as an issue advanced by “fringe” politicians, a pointed jab at Price’s unauthorized foray into the sensitive topic. Ley reiterated that access to abortion is a state issue and that the federal Liberals have no intention of altering the current settings from a health perspective.

Obviously, individuals have their own views, and Jacinta is entitled, as a member of the National Party, to her own view, but the federal Liberals have no intention of changing the settings when it comes to this issue.

– Sussan Ley, Deputy Liberal Leader

Pro-Life Senator Calls for Restraint

Even Queensland senator Matt Canavan, a self-described pro-life advocate, refused to back Price’s comments. Instead, he called for a more measured approach, stating that he doesn’t believe there’s anything to be gained by playing out the abortion debate in a “tit-for-tat” process during the heat of an election campaign.

It’s a really sensitive issue for people and I really feel for young mums who have been through this… I’m not ever going to have to experience that, I don’t think that says you can’t have a view on it, but I do try and be sensitive about it.

– Matt Canavan, Queensland Senator

Canavan’s call to “turn the temperature down” on the abortion debate reflects a growing concern among Coalition members that Price’s unauthorized comments could prove to be an unwelcome distraction and potentially alienate voters at a critical juncture in the campaign.

Labor and Greens Respond

Federal Health Minister Mark Butler stressed that abortion access is a state responsibility, noting that the Labor government has taken steps to improve access to non-surgical abortions by removing restrictions. He reaffirmed his commitment to ensuring that all Australian women have equitable access to the healthcare they need, particularly those in rural and regional areas and those experiencing disadvantage.

Greens spokesperson on women Larissa Waters expressed her appalment at the notion of politicians debating women’s right to choose, stating unequivocally that “abortion is healthcare, and that’s a national issue.” She called for a focus on making abortions affordable and accessible for everyone, rather than restricting the legal right to choose.

It’s ludicrous that anyone would propose forcing someone to go through with an unplanned pregnancy against their wishes. If you don’t want to have an abortion, don’t have one, but you don’t get to tell other women what choices they should have.

– Larissa Waters, Greens Spokesperson on Women

The Potential Electoral Fallout

As the federal election looms, the Coalition leadership’s swift rejection of Price’s abortion comments underscores the potential electoral risks associated with wading into such a divisive and emotionally charged issue. With several states already embroiled in debates over abortion access, sparked by conservative politicians seeking to re-examine existing laws, the opposition appears keen to avoid a similar quagmire at the national level.

The key questions now are:

  • Will Price’s unauthorized comments continue to draw attention away from the Coalition’s core campaign messages?
  • How will voters react to the internal divisions within the Coalition on such a sensitive issue?
  • Can the opposition effectively distance itself from Price’s stance without alienating its conservative base?

As the campaign enters its final stretches, the Coalition’s ability to navigate this unexpected controversy and maintain a united front may well prove crucial to its electoral prospects. With the stakes higher than ever, even the slightest misstep could have far-reaching consequences come election day.