EuropeNews

McLaren Boss Calls US GP Penalty ‘Inappropriate’ Amid Title Fight

The US Grand Prix took a contentious turn as McLaren Team Principal Andrea Stella denounced the penalty handed to Lando Norris as “inappropriate,” potentially jeopardizing the young Briton’s Formula 1 title hopes. The incident unfolded during a scintillating duel between Norris and championship rival Max Verstappen in the closing stages of the race.

Controversial Clash and Penalty

With just four laps remaining, Norris audaciously overtook Verstappen for third place, a crucial move in their battle for the championship. However, both drivers ran wide during the maneuver, leading to a post-race investigation by the stewards. Much to McLaren’s dismay, Norris was subsequently penalized, demoting him to fourth and dealing a significant blow to his title aspirations.

Stella: Penalty “Interfered with Beautiful Motorsport”

An incensed Stella pulled no punches in his assessment of the stewards’ decision. Speaking to Sky Sports, he lambasted the interference in what he deemed a “beautiful piece of motorsport.”

“My view is that the way that the stewards interfered with a beautiful piece of motorsport was inappropriate because both cars were off track, so both cars gained an advantage.”

Andrea Stella, McLaren Team Principal

Stella emphasized that McLaren had thoroughly reviewed the incident and concluded that both drivers had gone off-track, rendering the maneuver legitimate in their eyes. He expressed frustration at the inability to appeal the decision, leaving the team no choice but to move forward.

Red Bull Defends “Slam-Dunk” Decision

Unsurprisingly, Red Bull Team Principal Christian Horner held a contrasting viewpoint. He staunchly defended the stewards’ call, labeling it a “slam-dunk” decision.

“For us it was crystal clear that the pass had been made off the track so he should have given the place back. He chose not to so therefore there was a penalty. For us it was very much a black and white scenario.”

Christian Horner, Red Bull Team Principal

Norris: Stewarding “Inconsistent” and “Rushed”

An exasperated Norris voiced his frustrations, criticizing the stewards for their inconsistency and hasty decision-making. The 24-year-old argued that Verstappen had over-defended and made a mistake, yet still benefited from the outcome.

“I don’t think you can appeal this kind of penalty, which is, again, a silly thing because they’re just guessing and I don’t think that’s how stewarding should be done.”

Lando Norris

Norris, now trailing Verstappen by a daunting 57 points, lamented that the stewards lack the same level of understanding and perspective as the drivers behind the wheel.

Title Implications and Road Ahead

The US GP controversy has undoubtedly shifted the dynamics of the championship battle. With McLaren’s lead over Red Bull in the constructors’ standings reduced to a mere 40 points, every decision carries immense weight.

As the Formula 1 circus moves on to the next round, the reverberations from this incident will likely linger. The spotlight now shines even brighter on the stewards, their consistency, and the potential impact of their calls on the destiny of the 2024 titles.

The stage is set for a gripping conclusion to the season, with Norris and McLaren determined to rebound from this setback and Verstappen and Red Bull equally resolute in their pursuit of glory. The battle lines have been drawn, and the US GP penalty drama may prove to be a pivotal moment in this enthralling championship narrative.